And now for the grossly undialectical bit. The ink on the Times was not yet dry when Andrew Sullivan rushed to the defense of his idol, I mean Obama. When one types all the time, sooner or later everything will be typed, and so Sullivan, in his fury against Kristol, typed this: "A non-Christian manipulator of Christianity is calling a Christian a liar about his faith." Ponder that early adjective. It is Jew baiting. I was not aware that only Christians can judge Christians, or that there are things about which a Jew cannot call a Christian a liar. If Kristol is wrong about Obama, it is not because Kristol is a Jew. So this fills me with a certain paschal wrath. Nice little blog you have there, Obama boy. Pity if frogs or locusts should happen to it. Let my people be!
Of course, if Kristol was a Christian believer, Sullivan would call him a "Christianist" because of his political stances. Does anyone still think this gay goofball is a conservative?
"Of course, if Kristol was a Christian believer, Sullivan would call him a "Christianist" because of his political stances. Does anyone still think this gay goofball is a conservative?"
ReplyDeletefor that matter, does having a man crush on Jesus make one a Christian, especially when one goes around calling fellow Christians "Christianists"? it seems sullivan's idea of heaven is loud techno music and hitting the dance floor shirtless with Jesus, Hitchens, and Obama in a holy trinity of hotness.
LOL, that's quite a "view from your window". You're on today.
ReplyDelete