Dreher recently reopened the conversation himself from some who suggested his gecko wasn't green enough, Cockney enough, and maybe really didn't save them all that much money after all the advertising costs were finally factored in. In true Dreher form he appealed to someone else to keep his illusory imperial pants decently up where they belong, in the process hysterically charging his critics (second hand, passive-aggressively) with "Christian Derangement Syndrome".
The very first commenter out of the starting gate nails Dreher's advertising chimera:
Republican or Christian derangement syndrome is often easy to identify, and to justify: because we generally know what a Republican, or what a Christian is.
The problem with your “Benedict Option,” Rod, is that too often you tell readers what it is not, or give some highly refined and narrow example of what it is by means of anecdote.
But unlike Christianity or Republicanism, I don’t see a clear articulation of “the Benedict Option” is supposed to be, and more pointedly, how it is supposed to work (economically, financially, socially.)
From another angle: people often don’t misunderstand “the Amish option” because it’s so clear how (most) Amish people live, even if Old Order Amish get to speak for the rest of the Amish, who may not be as strict.
In short, it’s not “derangement syndrome” if it’s hard to categorically articulate and describe what “it” is supposed to be.
Dreher then unequivocally explains what the is of it is if it were:
[NFR: And for the millionty-billionth time, the question I'm asking is: is it possible to build a community that avoids, or at least minimizes, the problems of these failed ones? Can we learn from their mistakes? I don't accept the jibe, "Oh, see, you're JUST LIKE David Koresh!" -- RD]
Alright, let's accept for the sake of argument that, if it's not in fact nothing more than a conversational eschatological gecko, Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ is something that actually might be striven for. And who better to illustrate that lifestyle than the creator of the brand himself, Rod Dreher?
What sort of Benedict Option does the brand master Rod Dreher live out in real life?
I am a prosperous middle-class Christian living like the King of Exurbia in the freest and richest nation that ever was.
Yes, indeedy. And Crunchy Con himself ain't about to give up strolling tastings of premium bourbons on the streets of his fairytale Southern Shire, or vacations in France, the Netherlands and Italy, or trips to eat at New Orleans' finest restaurants in order to spend the extra time either getting closer to God or carrying out Jesus' mandates. Oh - remember Crunchy Cons? They too were important, at least until his book about them hit the remaindering bin like a meteor; he hasn't wasted a dozen paragraphs on that dead nag of an idea since.
Because, in reality, Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ can be whatever you want it to be. It's that magical copper bracelet that helps you think of yourself as exactly the sort of person you would like to think of yourself as, except, you know, more so. When you take Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™, you flee the morally corrosive effects of that single mom who works at the porn store because in Dreher's Obamacon America that's the only job she can get and that grubby kid of hers who might teach your kid a bad word for the theotic refuge of fellow effete foodies who smash ice for their mint juleps together with handmade pear wood mallets on granite counter tops. Really, could Jesus' mandate be any more clear?
While those who stubbornly still can't find their way to that happy place somewhere over the rainbow continue to totter around, rebounding from door jambs, the Christian butt sex team comes to Dreher's rescue, bringing Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ full circle, nose to tail, or back to its "proper place", as classicists talking about these things might say: clickbaity readers' conversations about Rod Dreher writing about Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™. Alpha and Omega.
Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™. Coffee talk by discriminating religious talkers talking about Rod Dreher writing about Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™, because Christ's Church alone just might not be good enough, not smart enough, an ordinary, worldy pea tormenting your well-fed, something-more-seeking princess bottom - and of course you might end up having to sit next to that mousy single mom who works at the porn store.
Frankly, when Rod Dreher finally concludes there will never be a profitable book to be had about Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ (subtitle: Crunchy Cons Refrijoles), I expect talk about Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ to go exactly where all that important and exciting talk about Crunchy Cons is furiously boiling away these days: like yesterday's dew in the desert.
In the meantime, if you stubbornly cling to your guns and religion and your ordinary ice-crushing framing hammer instead of taking the more ultimatey everything Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ (or the ALS challenge, for that matter), if what-ees-thees-ordinary-"church"-theeng? happens to be all the Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ you need in life, don't be surprised if your betters hold their noses, insinuating your manifest "derangement". Passive-aggressively, of course.
UPDATE (as they say): What Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ surely must be good for: providing additional plausible deniability the next time some parenting app exposes your own failings in that department.
Yeah, it's a meta-conversation. Of course, I agree with tMFKS that it's also aptly described as vaporware.
ReplyDelete...or make that a meta-meta-conversation.
DeleteOr possibly a meta-meta-meta-conversation....
I think of the RDBO as the sound of one hand reaching around and shaking itself in congratulations.
DeleteWe should do a essay contest. Everybody who reads this blog should participate! Answer the following question: "What does Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ means to you?"
DeleteObligatory Relevant Deep Thought.
ReplyDeleteI think a good novel would be where a bunch of men on a ship are looking for a whale. They look and look, but you know what? They never find him. And you know why they never find him? It doesn’t say. The book leaves it up to you, the reader, to decide. Then, at the very end, there’s a page you can lick and it tastes like Kool-Aid.
The RDBO is like a tale in which a mysterious world traveler is telling others about this wonderful place that is the perfect society, where everybody thinks alike and dresses alike and there is no war and it's awesome. Funny thing, tho, the traveler himself doesn't live there and hasn't been there for many years. (Oops -- maybe this has already been done.)
DeleteOr if we're talking music, the RDBO is like some guy who lives on the Upper West Side in NYC singing a song imagining that there's no possessions, greed, or hunger, but just a brotherhood of man sharing all the time. He might be a dreamer, but he's not the only one.
Pik, the RDBO is the Chipotle of religious experience, providing that organic nutrition for the soul as well as immune system support against a corrosive modern age that your nutritionally suspect Catholic King and McProtestant corner eateries just can't offer. Not only that, but as we saw with Dreher and his lawyer mom friend, it allows you to become an early and widespread adopter of that cutting edge technology crucial to having your children see you as their bestest friend of all, while creating an environment where, should the technology happen to let the real world in, your children's first response at age seven will be anguished self-loathing rather than blaming you. Truly a utopia in the fullest sense of that word, as you point out.
DeleteNo one uses the titillating mix of children and perverse sex to sell a blog like Rod Dreher does. Isn't this picture of a young boy discovering his first "ttis" just adorable? It's like "Home Alone - Making Mammaries for a Lifetime". Wonder if the investor/producer who optioned TLWORL has tapped Rod to write the screenplay.
ReplyDeleteI am quite new to this blog, but there seems to be an awful lot of attention given to Rod Dreher in these parts. I can see that he is generally disliked here, if not despised. But are there not other subjects that are not more important than the contents of other blogs? If I may say, it seems rather excessive. It's just a thought, that's all.
ReplyDeleteThe points in this post obviously escaped you completely, so I guess that's my fault for not connecting the dots with a larger magic marker.
DeleteIn and of himself Rod Dreher is really not interesting at all, little more than a depressive, self-pitying Southern boy with Daddy issues and profound sexual neuroses.
But given his outsized voice, he constantly serves to illustrate the most modern, most cutting-age deformities in Man's relationship to God and Man alike, deformities he wears as a sandwich board to slake his unquenchable need for personal attention. That's why I find him an unending, fascinating target for parody and criticism even though I'm not Catholic and his passive-aggressive, sour grapes professional Catholic-bashing only impacts my friends here. They themselves do post on a whole bunch of other things all the time.
Did you have a specific request, a shout-out to a special friend, maybe?
Thank you for the prompt reply Keith. The original post was perfectly clear, so I'll forgo the offer of a magic marker. My question was not about the post itself, but the degree of attention given to Dreher generally, which struck me as a triffle too much. If you think he is a symptom of a wider malaise, then that is the explanation I am after. As I said, I was curious. What special friend do you think I have?
DeleteI didn't say I thought you had a special friend. You were criticizing the content of a blog you passively consume, suggesting the content mix wasn't precisely to your specifications. I was asking, in the vernacular of any American who has ever listed to a music radio station, if you had a special request that would solve your problem, , if not for yourself then maybe for a friend or loved one. But really, I'm not the one you should be addressing your blog criticisms and tune requests to, talk to Pauli.
DeleteAs long as you continue to need this personal attention, though, I'll keep replying to you. It's the least I can do.
I am quite new to this blog, but there seems to be an awful lot of attention given to Rod Dreher in these parts.
DeleteWelcome! Yes, you are correct. There is a disproportionately large amount of criticism of Rod Dreher on this blog. BUT we don't believe that it is an inappropriately large amount.
I, for one, am astounded that more Catholics aren't appalled by his rather incessant Catholic church bashing. There are Catholic bloggers whom I generally respect that seem to give him a lot of deference for insights which other people have already had.
So I feel that the famous Limbaugh claim of "I am equal time" can be applied to this blog. You can read this and this for more background on how we became drawn into this fray over time.
And you can read this 14-page-and-counting Topix thread which contains enough Dreher-criticism to make us look like pikers in comparison.
Hi, anonymous.
DeleteIf anything, we've been a little light on Dreher content around here lately. C'mon, we've had Black Sabbath and AC/DC cover bands, and some Islamist chatter to boot. (I'll admit that I haven't helped with keeping things Dreher-centric. I'm in a Dreher-fatigue phase these days, but I'm sure I'll be back on the job soon.)
As Pauli indicated, Dreher is sort of a common cause among those hanging out here. Because Dreher is a daily font of:
self-righteousness, elitism and seriously misplaced priorities in the moral and political spheres
(borrowing from from Pauli's second linked "this"), he serves as a good foil for us to comment on such things (while trying to stay clear of the same sins ourselves).
Hang around here, comment as you'd like, and grab a handle so that we know who we're talking to.
Sorry, this is the Topix link.
DeleteWRT grabbing a handle, good idea esp. since I just re-instituted anon comments. I really would rather not, but all you have to do is put your name at the end.
It seems to me that Dreher has no idea what St. Benedict was up to or under what circumstances St. Benedict lived.
ReplyDeleteYep.
DeleteI agree. For one thing, Benedict's "option" did not include bringing the wife and kiddies along. Benedict wrote his monastic rule to govern his monastery that was comprised of MEN who were either lay brothers or ordained priests.
DeleteHe founded his monastery at a time when the Roman Empire was falling apart and lawlessness what the rule of the day.
Often the solitary hermits and small monastic enclaves were victimized, so he created a rule to organize monks into larger monasteries.
His sister, St. Scholastica organized a convent for like-minded women at the foot of Monte Casino using his "Rule."
The primary motto of the Benedictines is "Ora et Labora" -- Pray and Work. Work seems to be something pretty foreign to Mr. Dreher.
Archbishop Chaput offers his own take on the Benedict Option, based in part on Pope Benedict's take, toward the end of this article:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.crisismagazine.com/2014/law-morality-public-discourse-christians-can-rebuild-culture
By contrast, Rod Dreher's Benedict Option™ is a retreat to a place (even far indoors, right next door) where the bullies can never again pull your pants down as the adults laugh and step over them. Others should join him there so he won't feel so alone in his Charles Foster Kane Rosebud moment. As for the rest of us, I suppose we'll just have to keep on keeping on while we pine for that better Christian time, the one where all we had to face was bubonic plague and mother-raping Visogoths, without the scourge of - shudder - Kim Kardashians and their terrifying, post-Modern bosoms.
Delete