Thanks for posting this, Pauli. I'll use your post for future reference when challenged.
I agree especially with the premise that the corporate media is the biggest source of disillusionment by many. It has baffled me why there has been such a lack of curiousity from the media about the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. You'd think there would be a Pulitzer-level story in there somewhere, either in discovering the fraud or providing a cogent explanation of why there wasn't enough fraud to be relevant. Instead, all we've gotten for analysis are adjectives ("debunked", "baseless", etc.) when referring to someone raising the question.
There is a similar staggering lack of curiousity about other related topics (imprisonment of those accused in the Jan 6 event). Heck, there's even a meta-story out there for someone about why there is such a lack of curiosity by the media.....
"It is not our part here to take thought only for a season, or for a few lives of Men, or for a passing age of the world. We should seek a final end of this menace, even if we do not hope to make one." — Gandalf the Wizard, The Fellowship of the Ring
Thanks for posting this, Pauli. I'll use your post for future reference when challenged.
ReplyDeleteI agree especially with the premise that the corporate media is the biggest source of disillusionment by many. It has baffled me why there has been such a lack of curiousity from the media about the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. You'd think there would be a Pulitzer-level story in there somewhere, either in discovering the fraud or providing a cogent explanation of why there wasn't enough fraud to be relevant. Instead, all we've gotten for analysis are adjectives ("debunked", "baseless", etc.) when referring to someone raising the question.
There is a similar staggering lack of curiousity about other related topics (imprisonment of those accused in the Jan 6 event). Heck, there's even a meta-story out there for someone about why there is such a lack of curiosity by the media.....