Wednesday, May 16, 2012

I wish they'd turn up the volume, but...

Dr. Jeff Mirus makes a good point about the disappointing silence of Donald Cardinal Wuerl with regard to the Sibelius/Georgetown scandal. Basically the silver lining is in the Washington diocesan newspaper. Excerpt:

Second, it is enormously telling that the editor of Cardinal Wuerl’s newspaper felt at liberty to write clearly on Georgetown’s decision. The editor made it crystal clear that the decision to invite Sebelius was not only wrong but very typically wrong. It stated point blank that Georgetown can be more relied on to attack the Faith than to defend it. This kind of frankness is rare in the diocesan press.

Now it would have been very foolish of the editor to publish this editorial without knowing that Cardinal Wuerl approved. And in the long run it will prove foolish of Georgetown to, in effect, deliberately and directly pick a fight with the bishops. This is not your father's Church. The Modernists are not as strong as they were forty years ago. Even if they still control many universities and religious orders, they no longer control the episcopate. By a direct onslaught, Georgetown has hastened the day when it will find this out.

I don’t know exactly what can be done about Georgetown at this juncture. Certainly if Cardinal Wuerl can do more, he should; and if he cannot do more, it would be better for him to square off against Georgetown on this issue both personally and publicly. But that he is willing to permit the battle lines to be hardened is not nothing. That the Archdiocesan newspaper should so clearly want the faithful to realize that Georgetown is both wrong and unCatholic is not nothing. Not so many years ago, this would have been unthinkable.

Even so, I wish people like Cardinal Wuerl would turn up the volume of disapproval of Sebelius. Really, what's the circulation of a diocesan newspaper? The Bishops really should take a page out of Bill Donohue's book and whip out the media megaphone machine.

7 comments:

  1. "The Bishops really should take a page out of Bill Donohue's book and whip out the media megaphone machine."

    Maybe. But what king, about to go to make war against another king, doth not first sit down, and think whether he be able, with ten thousand, to meet him that, with twenty thousand, cometh against him -- even if that other king deserves a good whipping? If the good effects of a prudential act are disproportionate to the bad effects, you shouldn't perform the act.

    There are two moreovers: 1) The laity are not completely helpless in these circumstances, and may in some ways be more effective that the bishops could be. 2) Word on the street is that there's more to come from the Archdiocese.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point about the laity, Tom. But there is the scandal of this happening at a Catholic institution and the Cardinal is the head of the diocese. And as to the analogy one could argue that the wise king has already been assaulted.

    I like Wuerl and I think he sometimes gets a bad rap, but I'd like to see him turn and fight the Balrog now and again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Georgetown and Notre Dame (remember, they invited Obama to speak at their commencement) are both nationally-known schools closely identified with the catholic faith. Their trashing of catholicism is a matter for the USCCB, not just their particular archdiocese. If there's going to be a separation of the American catholic church, Notre Dame and Georgetown are the fissure points where it begins (began). The USCCB needs to present them the question: are you in or out? Yes or no?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would like to see that line in the sand, but it's not most US bishops' style. Plus they have what I would call an "overly pastoral" attitude toward wayward institutions. I'd like to see them just disassociate the church from those places, just like when they close a church and sell the property. Then we can see if those places sink or swim as a "used to be Catholic" school. But that's just me--I'm just a convert who isn't related to a long line of fighting Irish and hoya fans. I'm probably missing the point.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I guess my point is it shouldn't be only Wuerls problem, and by taking it on he might be unnecessarily de-emphasizing the far-reachedness of the catholic academia program.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Problem not program

    ReplyDelete