Monday, June 24, 2013

Musings on a "Third Way"

Allow me to relate a small part of my weekend musings here. I recently received a short yet hysterical email which tacitly accused me of using a pseudonym so as to conceal my identity. But as I've said before, Pauli isn't a pseudonym; it's a nickname. Most people here know my surname and generally where I live. These things are not hard to figure out if you read enough of the blog and follow the links, and I often send emails to readers—and sometime would-be readers—which reveal my actual name. I'm really not worried about people discovering it.

Some bloggers who are in the habit of using their full name are a bit obsessed with those who choose not too. They'll talk about how pseudonymity encourages excessive carelessness and insensitivity when expressing opinions due to an immunity from any consequences. Others advocate the importance of pseudonyms, and how they facilitate free speech which is otherwise gagged for fear of repercussions. The false dichotomy that some of these bloggers perpetuate is that you're either boldly announcing in neon your name, address, what parish you belong to, how many kids you have and pets you own, etc. or you are living a double-life, hiding behind a wall of deception and hurling bombs from the pseudonymous online bunker you've constructed.

A third way avoids both the neon and the bunker. You could call it the "nickname way" if you feel you must call it something. This way of presenting your ideas is probably not available to someone who writes for a major media company or is a published author. If you are already a public figure when you start a blog, and you don't have an established moniker, then you might be perceived as using a pseudonym unless you use your real name. And you'll probably be expected to identify yourself anyway, being a public figure.

Here's the thing: most of us aren't public figures or columnists and we'd rather not have the trouble that goes with that. If you get interviewed by the local rag because you found a lost puppy does that make you a public figure? No. If you speak up at the town council meeting about bad zoning decisions does that make you a public figure? No. If you witness a crime and give a recorded testimony to the police does that make you a public figure? No. Then why should running a free online newsletter, AKA a blog, give you all the responsibilities and burdens of being a public figure? It doesn't, and if you think it does, you might want to check your ego, man. Or woman.

None of this is to say that I'd be necessarily against someone going ahead and going the anonymous/pseudonymous route. That may be harder than people realize, as we know from recent blog history. Like I've said before, there's enough info within the pages of my blog to "out" me for who I am. Just be aware of this fact: nobody cares.

And here's another interested point to consider. The most pseudonymous commenters on my blog, people like The Man from K Street and our own blogger Pikkumatti, are some of the best commenters on the site, and they never indulge in scurrilous attacks or over-the-top accusations. Likewise for our first-name bloggers and commenters like Keith, Kathleen, Diane and Silicon Valley Steve. These anecdotes agree with the latest statistical findings on this topic, by the way.

4 comments:

  1. As anyone who has read Mark Shea or, you know, me, can attest, using one's full name does not always engender good blog behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just noticed I still don't have my name on my blog. I set it up that way in 2002 to keep my Google footprint from exploding, though I did include a link to a public homepage I was maintaining.

    I'm pretty sure the carelessness and insensitivity is just who I am.

    I was also reminded this week that I use a pseudonym on Discus, mostly because I can't be bothered to change whatever it was that I entered into the fields when I first set it up however many years ago.

    I had to be reminded because my Discus username -- "capaxdei" -- is the name of an email account I've used since before I started blogging, and I hadn't thought that anyone who cared who commented under that handle wouldn't know that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have a really common name, so I've never had to worry a whole lot about search engines. Even so, I see no reason to jump out in front, so to speak.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Considering I just had a neighbor tell my wife that he googled me, that was probably a wise decision.

      My saving grace is that I didn't use my full name in the early days of my blogging when I was really raw.

      Delete