Wednesday, October 30, 2013

"That's that hard part again!"

This cartoon reminds me of Obamacare.

Jerry's Uncle Paco has a high opinion of his own performance and just has to stop now and again to explain why he's having trouble with the hard parts. Jerry is smiling delightedly the entire time because he loves Paco and patiently supports him even though his friend, well, sucks.

Go on over to Dailykos or other places where they love big government and you can read all kinds of love pieces about how fabulous Obamacare is. Like this one. Even though a majority of Americans think it's a train wreck and now have hard evidence to support their belief.

This will be a fun day for Sebelius in Washington DC. My advice to her is to start crying at a strategic point so she appears to be human. My advice to Republicans is to throw water on her like Dorothy does to the witch in Wizard of Oz.

But seriously, doesn't it seem like Sebelius and company are whistling past the graveyard here? From another article:

A component of the online system that has been working relatively well experienced an outage Sunday. The federal data services hub, a conduit for verifying the personal information of people applying for benefits under the law, went down in a failure that was blamed on an outside contractor, Terremark.

"Today, Terremark had a network failure that is impacting a number of their clients, including," HHS spokeswoman Joanne Peters said. "Secretary Sebelius spoke with the CEO of Verizon this afternoon to discuss the situation and they committed to fixing the problem as soon as possible."

Jeffrey Nelson, a spokesman for Verizon Enterprise Solutions, of which Terremark is a part, said: "Our engineers have been working with HHS and other technology companies to identify and address the root cause of the issue. It will fixed as quickly as possible."

There's the new line. "We've identified the problem and it will be fixed as soon as possible." Sounds an awful lot like Paco's "That's that hard part again." Someone from CGI is going to write a book about this debacle, and none of it will be a surprise any more than this little factoid revealing the affirmative action/cronyism behind the website development.


  1. I streamed just a bit of it. She was able to dodge most of the criticism in the usual way ("Clearly, I am not hot swapping code." when the question clearly pertained to the whole organization).

    But Rep. Rogers' questions about no end-to-end security testing, followed by his laying on her the memo saying that HHS thought it was an acceptable risk to skip that little detail, seemed to draw blood. At least enough so that horrid Waxman rat had to try to save her.

    Of course, her attitude matched the Hillary "What difference does it make?" attitude, without the screaming of course. IOW, "so what?" is the order of the day. Mission accomplished.

    1. There won't be any real consequences -- she's not going to lose her job. But the message to those with ears to hear is "This person should lose her job, this person would lose ANY OTHER job with such a bad performance and attitude."