Monday, July 20, 2015

Better ideas than the Benedict Option

Here we have a better "self-interview" than Keith's, if I may make so bold, about what the so-called Benedict Option most likely is, and why it probably is only good to help someone sell books, and is a nonstarter as a long term solution for religious people currently inhabiting planet Earth. Excerpt:

And Dreher wants Christians to drop our involvement in pro-life and pro-family politics and get busy doing . . . whatever it is. Except that when you confront him about how suicidally crazy that idea is, he pivots on his heel and insists he never meant that at all. All he meant was that we can’t save our souls and bring our children to God by voting Republican. When you ask him who ever said that we could, he never gives an answer. Because no one since AD 33 has ever made such a claim.

This is obligatory for anyone to point out because it is constantly being brought up by the Dreherites and paleocons, over and over.

Q: OK, so maybe we shouldn’t trust the messenger, but what’s wrong with taking St. Benedict as our inspiration? 

A: St. Benedict himself would find the idea puzzling. That mystical ex-hermit never tried to organize laymen, but monks—men who could live and work together only because they took vows of celibacy, poverty, and obedience. Benedict drafted his famous Rule to teach monks how better to obey these particular, difficult vows. Married people make very different promises. They don’t obey an abbot but are subject to each other. They’re called to be fertile, not celibate; thrifty and prudent, not poor. The proper bourgeois virtues of responsible Christian parents are almost the diametrical opposite of monastic communalism. Most historical attempts to found such communities among married couples have ended in farce or disaster.

Emphasis mine. This is another thing to constantly point out. We shouldn't have to, but we do for the same reason that young lovers need to be told that someday they will be just like their parents. I.e., immaturity, laziness and reluctance to face the Truth.

Today Christians face something that behaves much more like Islam. It is a rising empire of aggressive secularism, with a deep historical grudge against our faith. Gay activists, New Atheists, radical feminists, population controllers, multiculturalists, and other powerful interest groups see orthodox Christianity as their enemy. We once wielded power throughout the culture as they lived on the margins, and now they are looking for payback. They will know where to find us. Subjecting faithful Christian churches to a crushing, punitive tax is just the beginning. Think of it as the jizya.

Speaking of Islam, the Muslims are not going to help us with our religious freedom struggles one bit. Attacks on Judeo-Christian morality of the west are good for them since they have a moral code with very little overlap.

As we always suggest about good articles, read the whole thing. The author links to a really funny but serious article which he wrote with Jason Jones a few weeks back. Basically it is plea for young people to get a real job and quit self-impoverishing by bad major choices.


12 comments:

  1. Most historical attempts to found such communities among married couples have ended in farce or disaster.

    So true! But tell that to our friend Blogger, who insists that Catholic reluctance to turn laypeople into pseudo-monks is just one more sign of our horrible Western decadence and arch-heterodoxy. :D

    This is great stuff, Pauli. Thanks for posting!

    ReplyDelete
  2. If anyone doubts at this point that Rod Dreher's Benedict Option is anything other than a ruthlessly managed marketing campaign dedicated primarily to promoting a successful book proposal for Rod Dreher (while also feeding any remoras successfully attaching themselves to it), his and his employer's most recent move - something Google doesn't do unless formally requested - to have an article critical of him wiped from Google's cache as well will hopefully bring them around.

    As I pointed out, this is hardball business, and the one thing the business is not about is saving Christians from their cultural threats and challenges. Instead, the Benedict Option bandwagon is about lining up Christians as feedstock.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Perhaps the most articulate critique of the Benedict Option comes in the comment from "Ted" posted on the following blog page:

    http://opuspublicum.com/2015/07/08/the-benedict-option-clarified/

    -----
    Let’s imagine for some reason that, out of the blue, a rogue virus struck only Christians, afflicting them with a spreading mass-psychosis wherein, like Tourette’s patients, they suddenly began blurting the phrase “Corn Hat!”, like a Twitter hashtag campaign, but where the Christians themselves had now become the Twitter accounts.

    “Everyone is talking about Corn Hat!,” they remark one to another. “How do you feel about Corn Hat!?” “I don’t know. Perhaps it would be good for us to have Corn Hat!” “But what is Corn Hat!?”

    “There is no formula for Corn Hat!,” the wise ones among them explain. “Every Christian must seek Corn Hat! in their own way. It may be crucial to our understanding of Corn Hat! if one of us were to write a book about it.”

    “If everyone is seeking Corn Hat!,” ordinary Christians mused, “perhaps we are placing ourselves at risk for not seeking it, too.”

    “But what is Corn Hat!?,” some stubbornly persist, “how will we know if we are seeking it correctly?”

    “We must obviously continue discussing and sharing Corn Hat! among ourselves,” their fellows replied. “In this way our wise ones can guide us to a more perfect understanding of Corn Hat!, and from there we can seek it most correctly.”

    “Corn Hat!,” they therefore responded, one after another, nodding. “Corn Hat!,” their fellows nodded in turn.
    -----

    I think that pretty much sums it up.

    The Other Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL!! I love Ted. Once, when some Class-A jerks 'n' bullies were giving me a rather hard time (personal insults and stuff) at that very same blog site, Ted intervened with a scathing critique that put them right in their pathetic little bullying place. It was wondrous to see. The jerks didn't dare peep after that. Georgie-Porgie, pudd'n and pie....

      Delete
    2. I wish we could invite Ted over here. :D

      Delete
  4. Somenonymous or otherJuly 21, 2015 at 5:51 PM

    http://www.mellzah.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/28726_398696928939_1093113_n.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my gosh. And I thought those cheesehead hats were bad. LOL.

      Delete
  5. BTW, have y'all seen this? I think it's worth a post. (Hint, hint, Keith; Pauli's really busy at the moment. ;) )

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/harrington-clergy-orthodox-great-need/

    Other people have picked up on the hypocrisy:

    "If Rod Dreher's schismatic priest's travails mean so much to him, why doesn't he forgo a European vacation or two?" -- John Beeler at Facebook (and at his blog).

    Someone at the infamous Topix thread also commented on the incongruity here.

    But, you know, sacrificing for others is just for the little people. The BenOp Elite are too busy inhaling trout meuniere at Gallatoire's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately, so am I, Diane. (Pik, maybe?)

      Delete
    2. Yep, it seems to be busy time for all of us these days.

      Here's some more fodder from John Beeler's blog:

      "If his schismatic priest's travails mean so much to him, why not forgo a luxury or two? The man's basically his house chaplain anyway. By the way, ROCOR's a cult. Nicely illiberal like Russia but still. If you hate this country's traditional culture including its church (birettas, novenas, and all) so much, Russia's not Communist anymore; I'll even chip in for your one-way plane fare. Anyway, for real strategic withdrawal, I'm not for the Benedict option but rather the Volodymyr (Sterniuk) option that stays in the church no matter what."

      Basically his house chaplain -- yeah, exactly!!

      Delete
    3. Am swamped too (I've got a full post on another angle of the BOp percolating when I can take a breath).

      One thing comes to mind on this, tho. While I didn't read TLWORL, I thought the premise was at least in part that small rural towns were awesome at pulling together when one of the residents was in need. Crunchy, you know.

      So perhaps WF has exhausted what help they can provide (which they may well have). But if not, perhaps Dreher has alienated the townfolk so much that his poor priest is being excluded due to his association/capture by Dreher. Or Dreher's touting of the awesomeness of small vs. big etc. was phony (i.e., people in small towns being about the same as in big cities -- they'll provide help, but not in the endearing quaint way that Dreher portrays).

      Delete