Oh, well...

Meanwhile... at the CLEVELAND AIR SHOW. #sequester twitter.com/JaiSimon/statu…

— Jai(@JaiSimon) March 30, 2013

Detail from Last Supper window, St. John Cathedral, Cleveland, OH

Took this snapshot with my iPhone right after Noon Mass the other day.

Source: Uploaded by user via Paul on Pinterest

So who's being "Binary"?

I was surfing around looking at anti-Sirico stuff after reading this jab by The Grumpy Mailman Blog when I came across this recent review by Elias Crim over at the American (cough) Conservative (cough, cough). Excerpt:

Culturally speaking, Fr. Sirico gradually became an adherent of the Reagan revolution, a movement that seemed to find its vindication in 1989, only to ossify intellectually in the years following. Even without an Evil Empire, the Reaganites seemed only able to think in a binary fashion: capitalism vs. socialism (or anything else). Even as supply-side economics became a matter of Republican institutional dogma, the historical record showed a growing government and increasing income inequality. Reagan’s vision of widespread employee ownership went unfulfilled, and for most members of the American middle class, the unintended consequence of economically neoliberal policies was a road to serfdom that by 2008 felt more like a superhighway. Wage slavery, with no path to ownership, or welfare: take your pick.

The author asserts that Reaganites are being "binary" when they point out that you either have some sort system based on economic freedom (like capitalism) or some sort of system based on central control (like socialism). But he goes on to state that Reaganism leads to either "Wage slavery, with no path to ownership, or welfare: take your pick." That sounds thoroughly binary to me, although I prefer to use the term false dichotomy to describe this particular fallacious view of reality. Sorry, but I'm not a "wage slave", whatever that is precisely, and I'm not on welfare, thank you very much. I left my job as an IT Professional (not a slave) and started an incorporated consultancy.

Furthermore, I have many friends who are neither slaves nor freeloaders. Sure, I know people who dislike their job. But most of them are able to change employers--and often do--and the ones who can't are most often constrained by external factors, not by whip-cracking capitalist villains in larger offices.

Finally, I'm not sure whether or not Mr. Crim considers those who pay him to write copy as his "slave-masters", but I'm pretty sure he is not a welfare case. The tag at the end of his review states that he "is at work on a new web zine to be called Solidarity Hall." I have to say that makes him sound very much like someone taking advantage of the freedom we have in our country to be an entrepreneur.

So his own existence itself is evidence against his own assertion, ironically. The more these people attempt to promote an imaginary Third Way, the more they just become dogmatists touting their own contrarian ideology.

Thanks for reading my blog. For current commentary and what-not, visit the Est Quod Est homepage

"Pleeeeeeeease!"

The Little Way Goes BIG TIME

The place where I come from is a small town 
They think so small, they use small words 
But not me

"Things are going to start happening to me now!"

Our friend H. M. Stuart suggested that this link announcing the Big Little Way sort of goes with the following clip from The Jerk.



Or, is it Little Big Way? I can never remember.

"I'm in print!!"

Pope Francis I

President Me

Never mind the sequester.  Obama has now taken on a new job, namely lecturing the Church on "the central message of the Gospel": 

"My hope is, based on what I know about the Catholic Church and the terrific work that they've done around the world and certainly in this country, you know, helping those who are less fortunate, is that you have a pope who sustains and maintains what I consider the central message of the Gospel that we treat everybody as children of God and that we love them the way Jesus Christ taught us to love them."

P.S.  As previously mentioned, I've undertaken reading An Introduction to Christianity by B16.  Fascinating, and humbling about how little I knew (and how little I still know).  Not to judge, but reading even a part of that work underscores how Obama ought to be embarrassed by his shallowness -- but he  apparently doesn't know enough to be embarrassed.  But it's part and parcel of Liberation Theology -- "the primacy of politics and economics . . . as the real powers that bring about salvation".

P.P.S.  BTW, the first part of An Introduction to Christianity is an education on the meaning of "I believe" in the Creed.  And, by extension, the rationale behind its change in the Mass.