Why not just have a big demolition derby? More fun....
This excerpt from Henry Payne's excellent and recent expose of the "Cash for Clunkers" program encapsulates one of the aspects which came to my mind when I first heard of the debacle.
Worse, Democratic demands that the guzzlers be permanently shredded means that already hurting used-car and -parts businesses will suffer. By insisting that the cars not only be crushed — but also that their engines be disabled — Congress’s decree will penalize the industry at time when a dozen U.S. parts suppliers have filed for bankruptcy this year.
“Why throw away good parts when the supply chain is in jeopardy?” the Automotive Recyclers Association’s Michael Wilson asked the AP. Good question.
I think von Mises would agree to file this latest bit of shuck 'n' jive under the general heading of destructionism. Conclusion:
The victims will be lower-income Americans who typically buy only used parts and vehicles. “Now you’re removing cars people could afford, and they’re not available anymore,” says Norm Wright, a Denver recycler. “There will be fewer cars to pull from, so the price of parts will go up.”
SUVs, apparently, aren’t the only things being sacrificed at the green altar.
If the enviro-yuppies were honest, then a sticker reading "Let them eat cake" would grace every hybrid bumper in the parking lot of the health food co-op.
And because the supply of used SUVs etc. will go down, then the price of those models on the used market will go up. Which will mean that the subsidy necessary to get someone to trade in a "clunker" will have to go up, or sales will drop. Which means that Congress will yet again authorize more money for the program (can't let Obama's idea fail now, can we?), which will continue the price inflation and further drive up the used SUV prices, which will . . . .
ReplyDelete