If a miracle happens in your church and you go directly to Rod Dreher with the news, are you trying to vet the authenticity, or are you going for maximum publicity? I report you decide. It's instructive to note what sort of pops out at me: the repeated use of the word Catholic. Four times in the original article post, once in the comments. I thought Mr. Dreher was an Orthodox Christian now? If so, what does he care about what the Catholics might say about an internal matter? Let's see:
After a couple of visits, we received an invitation to a party at the
Archbishop’s house, after the Dormition feast. I felt divided about
this. For one, I didn’t want to go to a fancy archbishop’s house. For
another, I had had enough of bishops and archbishops, men who had
wrecked the Catholic Church. I didn’t want to get mixed up with an
Orthodox one.
Oh, OK. My bad. The use of the word
Catholic is just a bonus leveraging of the story to once again
bash the Catholic Bishops and Archbishops who had "wrecked the Catholic Church". Got it.
Some people asked me in emails "What's with the picture?" They wondered why his head is covered. This caused me to search the terms
incorrupt Dallas and
I found much better pics here. Check this one out.
Looks a little bit nastier. And a lot less blurry
than this one which is one being circulated the most. Love to get a face shot, but alas. One commenter notes: "The photographs look like a decaying corpse to me. Trust me, I know what
dead bodies looks like. Haven't you people seen corruption before?"
And yes! You noticed it too. It's sort of like
this phenomenon, I guess. Some people see red vestments, others see gold. Another commenter asks: "Can you please explain why the change of vestments? One photo shows
Vladika Dimitry buried in gold vestments and another photo shows him
in red. Was it changed from gold to red, because he is being
proclaimed a Saint? Or was he buried in red and now is in gold? I'm
wanting to explain this appropriately to others in my community." So I guess we're looking for another miracle of auto-changing vestments on top of the semi-incorruptibly.
Maybe Archbishop Dmitri, née Robert Royster, was a saint. I'll leave any doubts about that for the comment section; the truth will out as they say. But honestly, OCA, you are going to let Rod Dreher of the
weeping statues, Rod Dreher of the family ghosts, Rod Dreher of
Muzhik fame be the person to prematurely announce to the world your latest miracle?
Here's something else worthy to report. The
Pravoslavie link with all the interesting pictures states the source for the photos as being this link on Facebook. Going to the
FB page reveals an update:
Dear Friends,
Today, I have been asked by OCA Metropolitan Tikhon “to immediately remove this post an all images associated with it”.
Also, I am “forbidden to post any pictures of Archbishop Dmitri without permission of the Holy Synod” (!)
It worth noting, that being a citizen of a free country, on my personal
page I will continue posting everything I want, as long as it is legal
ant true. However, out of obedience and respect of the office of the Metropolitan I choose to follow his order at this time.
Thus, some pictures and parts of the text will be removed.
As I stated before, all pictures of the Archbishop Dmitri’s
re-interment that are in my possession will be forwarded to proper
Church authorities for consideration, and I expect them to inform us
about their findings.
Yesterday we put Archbishop Dmitri in his final resting place in St. Seraphim Cathedral in Dallas.
I was blessed to be a part of a team, which uncovers Vladika’s earthly
remains and transfers them into new coffin to be buried in the crypt of
the Resurrection Chapel and probably should offer some comments about
these events.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------/CENSORED/-------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Few personal notes:
Obviously, I was glad to see Vladika's body incorrupt, but be it
otherwise, it would not affect my opinion about his sanctity at all.
The body of St Seraphim of Sarov, the Patron of our Cathedral, was
corrupted, but it does not change the fact that he is one of the most
beloved Saints around the world.
We all know that incorrupt body alone is not the reason of glorification.
Knowing Vladika for 11 years, seeing fruits of his life in the Lord, I
personally convinced that he is a Saint. I believe that there are many
more people all over the country, who share that conviction.
There is no decision of any group of people, respected (or not) would be
able to change that. If his body will be corrupted in two, 20 or 200
years (as some may wish), or will start to stream myrrh (as others may
desire) it will not be changed.
No one can stop me or anyone else
from addressing Vladika Dmitri in payer, and feel his response and
intercession; same way as many others all around US feel his love and
help.
All pictures I made during transfer of Archbishop Dmitri
body will be forwarded to proper Church authorities together with my
written statement for consideration.
So the plot thickens. It seems like a lot of this publicity wasn't welcome by the OCA, or maybe they had second thoughts when the thing got pimped by
D Magazine, Wick Allison's other rag. It is worthy to note that the
official article from the OCA on the reinterment doesn't mention the alleged incorruptibility of the Archbishop's corpse. At this point, the whole thing is purely a
santo subito phenomenon.
Personally I had no idea that myrrh-streaming was even on the table. But I sort of appreciate the hedging of the bet here pointing out that the Archbishop's corpse may be corrupted at some time down the road even though it's incorrupt now. Some miracles obviously have a time limit. I mean, gee whiz, does anyone expect that the Red Sea is still parted?
But going back to the Dreher post, can anyone not see why we roll our eyes when he writes stuff like these paragraphs:
But we went anyway, showing up on a rainy August afternoon at the
address on the card. It turned out to be not a palatial residence, but
the modest two-story woodframe house behind the cathedral. Could this
house, with the paint peeling, really be where the Archbishop of Dallas
and the South lives? I knocked on the door, and in we walked, with our
kids.
...
It was a family dinner. That’s how it struck us. Archbishop Dmitri, born
Robert Royster in Teague, Texas, was the opposite of everything I had
come to expect in a bishop. He was humble and kind and gentle. He loved
his people, and his people loved him. I remember thinking how good it
would be to be led by such a man.
Love and peeling paint, such a great combo. So, unlike Catholics who don't love their Bishops and don't receive any love from them, Orthodox Christians love their Bishop but can't keep his house in good repair. I've never seen peeling paint in any Catholic clergyman's house. The people of the parish won't stand for that. Or is love manifested in gushing words about supposed sanctity rather than concrete deeds? I was rather of the impression that Christ taught the opposite.