Friday, July 10, 2009

Sarah Palin: Death by a thousand cuts?

There have been many pieces on Sarah Palin lately. They come from many different angles; most of the ones I've read are good. Jonah's is insightful and thoughtful, as usual. So is Ross Douthat's.

Insightful, thoughtful... but are they useful? These are basically opinion pieces highlighting her strengths and weaknesses, and they have merit. But this one by John Fund actually explains why she stepped down.

This situation developed because Alaska's transparency laws allow anyone to file Freedom of Information Act requests. While normally useful, in the hands of political opponents FOIA requests can become a means to bog down a target in a bureaucratic quagmire, thanks to the need to comb through records and respond by a strict timetable. Similarly, ethics investigations are easily triggered and can drag on for months even if the initial complaint is flimsy. Since Ms. Palin returned to Alaska after the 2008 campaign, some 150 FOIA requests have been filed and her office has been targeted for investigation by everyone from the FBI to the Alaska legislature. Most have centered on Ms. Palin's use of government resources, and to date have turned up little save for a few state trips that she agreed to reimburse the state for because her children had accompanied her. In the process, though, she accumulated $500,000 in legal fees in just the last nine months, and knew the bill would grow ever larger in the future.

This is the kind of thing that news media glosses over, not just because of ideology but because of the yawn factor. Just like the ACORN agitators and their role in Obama's rise -- where's the story? You get better ratings when you say magic words like "pregnant teenager" or "Republican scandal". Here's Fund's depressing conclusion:

....Ms. Palin mostly likely will not run for president -- in 2012, at least. She made many mistakes after suddenly being thrust into the national spotlight last year, but hasn't merited the sneering contempt visited upon her by national reporters. She simply was not their kind of feminist -- and they disdained the politically incorrect life choices she had made.

In helping to convince Sarah Palin that her road forward in national politics would demand even more sacrifices and pain than exacted from most politicians, the media did nothing to encourage women or people of modest means to participate in politics. By sidestepping her critics, Sarah Palin is now moving to another playing field where she has more control over the rules of the game. Her friends say her critics may call her a "quitter" now, but they should wait and see what new role she decides to fill. She may wind up having the last laugh.

12 comments:

  1. I still think if she got intensive tutoring in syntax and and washington-speak (both substance and form) for several months to a year she would be a formidable candidate. It doesn't take much to bamboozle the media into thinking one is smart. we're talking about a town that considers Joe Biden intelligent, after all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What was done to Sarah Palin and her family was absolutely evil. I've never seen such undeserved hatred directed towards *anyone*. It was just pure moral insanity! I think she would have stuck it out if it were just her taking the hits. But her family being dragged through the mud was more than she was willing to put up with. I think she's done with politics...at least for the next decade or so. She decided her family was more important. She made the right decision.

    I really do hope that people like Keith Olbermann, Andrew Sullivan, Maureen Dowd, Katie Couric and the rest get every awful thing they deserve for the persecution of this poor woman and her family. Our media is in the hands of some truly evil people.

    Others who deserve comeuppance include radical feminists, snotty upper-middle-class soccer moms, lefty beta males and other worthless wastes-of-skin who joined in on the misogynistic, mindless bashing of Palin.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i just read the noonan piece on her. f***** ridiculous. will someone please tell me what this means? "she [Palin] is not going to be able to know how to think about Pakistan."

    Noonan spends the first half of the piece telling us Palin is not working class, and not uneducated, but yet Palin "is not able to know how to think about Pakistan."

    ReplyDelete
  4. I gave up trying to decode Noonan months ago, esp. WRT Sarah Palin.

    By the end of this year, Palin could have a book & show and segue into a life of "having more fun that a human being should be allowed to have" qua Rush Limbaugh. This will drive everyone on the left even crazier: pretty, skinny, right-wing AND RICH. SHe would deserve every penny, IMAO.

    ReplyDelete
  5. pretty skinny right-wing rich BUT ALSO happily-long-term-married and with 5 kids. i think the latter 2 factors evoke the most envy among women -- i mean, let's face it, noonan is divorced with one. but noonan probably doesn't even realize that's where the envy comes from, it's too deep.

    it's mean b/c it's true.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Susan B, you took the words right out of my keyboard. Evil is the operative word.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Off-topic -- Pauli, if you have a moment ;-), please post about the Ruth Bader Ginsburg bombshell. I feel the overwhelming urge to discuss it to death here, among friends, LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  8. it's mean b/c it's true.

    Yes, and over time it's simply become more and more obvious. I remember Michael Medved remarking back a few years ago that Noonan's criticisms of Bush sounded more like a jilted lover than anything substantive.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Diane,

    Yes, it is...these people are *so* evil. I mean Andrew Sullivan questions whether she gave birth to her own child! Then there is crap like this. Why couldn't these people just bask in the Beatific Vision of their Obamessiah? Why the continued campaign to destroy not only Palin but her family too?

    Speaking of Peggy Noonan, she always makes me think of this snarky piece on her written by a couple of women who used to know her. Now these two women are obvious leftists, and I certainly disagree with their assessment of Reagan, but the piece is amusing nevertheless.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have one more comment on this. (Sorry, but this subject is really a bee in my bonnet lately.) I have often thought that at a good portion of the hatred is inspired by bigotry against those with Down's Syndrome. I've seen such bigotry myself.

    Anyway, I noticed the following post that I think hits the mark: It Always Has Been About Trig

    ReplyDelete
  11. I was watching "Nightline" the day of her resignation and they did a background story on her with the egregious Terry Moran narrating (why do I tivo nightline?) anyway, while they showed footage of her holding Trig, with his face toward the camera, the voiceover was -- I KID YOU NOT -- "more often than not, her personal life resembled an episode of the Jerry Springer show"

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kathleen,

    God help me, but I hate these media people. They are disgusting and vile.

    ReplyDelete